Initial Combination Therapy With Adalimumab Plus Methotrexate Leads to Better Long-term Outcomes in Patients With Advanced Rheumatoid Arthritis: Analysis of the Final 10-Year Results of an Open-label Extension of a Phase 3 Trial Edward C Keystone1, Désirée van der Heijde2, Michael E Weinblatt3, Neelufar Mozaffarian4, Benoît Guérette4, Hartmut Kupper5, Shufang Liu4, Arthur Kavanaugh6 1University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; 2Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; 3Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States; 4Abbott, Abbott Park, Illinois, United States; 5Abbott GmbH & Co. KG, Ludwigshafen, Germany; 6University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States Abstract Background/Purpose: DE019 was a phase 3, randomized,
radiographic progression (49.4% vs. 61.1%). No new safety signals
Figure 2. Patient Disposition Table 1. Baseline Demographic and Disease Figure 3. Clinical and Functional Responses Following Up to 10 Years of Treatment With ADA + MTX Figure 4. Radiographic Outcomes Following Up to 10 Years of Treatment With ADA + MTX
controlled trial (RCT) in which patients with active, advanced
arose following up to 10 years of ADA exposure, and there was
Characteristics: 10-Year Radiographic Completers Randomized and entered DE019
rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and an inadequate response to
perhaps a trend towards fewer deaths than would be expected
methotrexate (MTX) were randomized to 1 year of adalimumab
from a matched population [SMR (95% CI) = 0.77 (0.52, 1.10)]. “Delayed ADA” “Initial ADA”
(ADA) 40 mg every other week (eow), ADA 20 mg weekly, or
Conclusions: Following up to 10 years of treatment with ADA + ADA 40 mg eow
placebo (PBO) injections; all received concomitant MTX. RCT
MTX, patients with long-standing RA experienced safe and
results demonstrated the clinical and radiographic superiority
effective disease control. Initial treatment with ADA led to better
Characteristics
of ADA + MTX over PBO + MTX1. All patients completing the RCT
outcomes than initial treatment with PBO, but the disparities in
Completed double-blind, placebo-controlled
were eligible to receive open-label (OL) ADA 40 mg eow + MTX for
clinical and functional response rates observed during the RCT
phase and entered open-label extension
an additional 9 years. This post hoc analysis evaluated observed
were largely ameliorated after treatment with OL ADA + MTX.
patient data to determine whether a 1 year delay in initiation of
Notably, radiographic damage remained lower in patients initially
ADA treatment results in differences in clinical, functional, or
randomized to ADA, owing to the more extensive damage accrued
radiographic effi cacy after up to 10 years of treatment.
during the RCT in PBO-treated patients. Reasons for all discontinuations through 10 years (N = 417) Methods: Clinical and functional outcomes were assessed Completed open-label extension (N = 202)
by the 28-joint disease activity score [DAS28(CRP)] and the
disability index of the health assessment questionnaire (HAQ-DI),
“initial ADA” Background/Purpose
respectively. Radiographic damage was assessed using the
modifi ed total Sharp Score (mTSS) at baseline (BL) and Years 1,
• Randomized, controlled, clinical trials in patients with RA have
8, and 10; progressors were defi ned as patients with a change (Δ)
established that adding tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors
in mTSS from BL >0.5. Differences in mean ΔmTSS between initial
A total of 6 patients from the original PBO + MTX treatment group discontinued without a
to existing MTX therapy in patients with an inadequate
corresponding reason following completion of the blinded study.
treatment arms were assessed using a constrained longitudinal
response to MTX results in signifi cant improvements in clinical,
data analysis. Safety was assessed in terms of adverse events
• Of the 457 patients who entered the OL extension,
functional, and radiographic outcomes1−6; however, the effect
202 (44.2%) completed 10 years of therapy (Figure 2)
on long-term disease control in these patients remains unclear
Results: Of the 619 patients initially randomized, 202 (32.6%; 80,
66, and 56 patients from the initial ADA 40 mg eow, ADA 20 mg
• The DE019 trial demonstrated the clinical and radiographic
• Baseline demographics and disease characteristics were
weekly, and PBO arms, respectively) continued on OL ADA + MTX
superiority of 1 year of adalimumab (ADA) + MTX combination
generally similar between patients with x-rays available at
Baseline and Year 10 and the overall intent-to-treat
treatment through Year 10. Effi cacy outcomes at Year 10 were
treatment over placebo (PBO) + MTX in patients with
not different between the 2 ADA arms; therefore, results for the
long-standing RA and an inadequate response to MTX1
population, with the exception that the population completing
10 years of treatment was younger1 (Table 1)
ADA 40 mg eow arm are presented as representative of both
(A.) ACR50/70/90 responses, (B.) mean tender (TJC) and swollen (SJC) joint counts, (C.) the percentages of patients achieving DAS28(CRP) <3.2 (LDA), DAS28(CRP) [DAS28(CRP) <2.6] and SDAI
(SDAI ≤3.3) remission, and (D.) the percentages of patients achieving normal physical function (HAQ-DI <0.5). “Delayed ADA” patients received PBO + MTX during year 1; “initial ADA” patients received
ADA arms. Following the switch to OL ADA + MTX, the signifi cant
• Demographics and disease characteristics at Baseline as well
% Patients % Patients
differences in clinical and functional responses observed during
as effi cacy outcomes at Year 10 were not different between
Objectives
Mean change from Baseline in (A.) mTSS, (B.) JE, and JSN at Years 1, 8, and 10. Cumulative probability plots of changes in mTSS (C.) from Baseline and (D.) from the beginning of the OL extension.
Year 1 (DAS28 = 3.4 and 4.5; HAQ-DI = 0.8 and 1.1 for ADA
Clinical and Functional Responses Over Time
• Fewer patients who received “delayed ADA” achieved
the 2 ADA groups (20 mg weekly and 40 mg eow, data not
“Delayed ADA” patients received PBO + MTX during Year 1; “initial ADA” patients received ADA + MTX throughout the study.
and PBO arms, respectively) were largely resolved following an
ACR50/70/90 responses over time compared with patients in
• To describe the long-term safety and impact of ADA + MTX
shown); therefore, data for the ADA 40 mg eow group are
• Differences in clinical and functional responses between
additional 9 years of OL ADA + MTX treatment (DAS28 = 2.4
the “initial ADA” group (Figure 3A), a fi nding consistent with
All values are mean ± standard deviation, unless otherwise indicated. Radiographic Outcomes Over Time
– Radiographic progression, although numerically higher
treatment on the improvement/maintenance of clinical,
presented as representative of both groups
the original treatment groups that were apparent at Year 1
aPatients enrolled in DE019 received ongoing MTX therapy.
and 2.7; HAQ-DI = 0.7 and 0.8 for initial ADA and PBO arms,
the greater persistence of tender and swollen joints in the
in the “delayed ADA” group, was comparable between
functional, and radiographic outcomes in patients with
[DAS28(CRP) = 4.5 and 3.4 and HAQ-DI = 1.1 and 0.8 for
Abbreviations: PBO, placebo; MTX, methotrexate; ADA, adalimumab; mg, milligram; eow, every
• Rates of radiographic nonprogression were superior for
respectively). In addition, rates of radiographic progression
“delayed ADA” group (Figure 3B)
the treatment groups once all patients were receiving OL
other week; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; DMARD, disease-modifying antirheumatic drug; DAS28,
long-standing RA who entered the DE019 trial and
the PBO + MTX and ADA + MTX groups, respectively] were
patients receiving ADA + MTX during Year 1 [83% (n = 67/81)
became comparable between the treatment arms during OL
28-joint disease activity score; CRP, C-reactive protein; dL, deciliter; TJC, tender joint count;
largely resolved following 9 years of OL ADA + MTX treatment
• The percentages of patients who achieved DAS28(CRP)
ADA + MTX (mean ΔmTSS at Year 10 = 4.3 vs. 2.0 for the
subsequently received up to 10 years of ADA + MTX therapy
SJC, swollen joint count; HAQ-DI, disability index of the health assessment questionnaire; PGA,
vs. 46% (n = 25/54) for the PBO + MTX group, P <.001],
ADA + MTX treatment (P = .22). However, patients initially
physician’s global assessment; VAS, visual analog scale; PaGA, patient’s global assessment;
[DAS28(CRP) = 2.7 and 2.4; HAQ-DI = 0.8 and 0.7 at
LDA, DAS28(CRP) remission, SDAI remission, and normal
but after 9 years of OL ADA, the differences were no longer
randomized to ADA had signifi cantly lower mean ΔmTSS
• To describe the impact of a 1-year delay in the addition
mTSS, modifi ed total Sharp score; JE, joint erosion score; JSN, joint space narrowing score.
Year 10, respectively]; however, cumulative disease activity
physical function were maintained through 10 years in both
statistically signifi cant [51% (n = 40/79) vs. 39% (n = 21/54)
• The JSN component of the mTSS appeared to drive
compared with patients initially randomized to PBO (0.7 vs. 6.2;
of ADA to existing MTX monotherapy in patients with
was signifi cantly greater in patients receiving “delayed
groups; however, patients in whom ADA treatment was
radiographic progression, irrespective of original treatment
P = .002), as well as a lower percentage of patients with
for the “initial ADA” and “delayed ADA” groups, respectively,
ADA” treatment [AUC for DAS28(CRP) over the 10-year
delayed for 1 year generally did not achieve the same level
P = .18]; similar results were observed for the proportion of
(Figure 4B)
period = 1648 and 1439, for the “delayed ADA” and “initial
of response as patients who initially received ADA + MTX
patients having minimal radiographic progression (ΔmTSS ≤5
• Among the patients who experienced radiographic
ADA” groups, respectively; P = .007]
(Figures 3C and 3D)
over 10 years, data not shown)
progression, those who received “delayed ADA” treatment
• During the 9-year OL period, approximately 50% of patients
experienced more severe progression than those initially
in both groups did not progress radiographically; still, patients
receiving ADA + MTX, even after 10 years of treatment
Study Design and Patients
– Radiographic progression was assessed in patients whose
who received “delayed ADA” treatment had signifi cantly
(Figure 4C); this difference persisted even when only the
time-averaged disease activity was in remission during the
• DE019 was a 1-year, phase 3, randomized, double-blind,
Adults ≥18 years with a diagnosis of RA as defi ned by the
higher mean ΔmTSS at Year 10 compared with patients who
OL extension period was considered (Figure 4D)
PBO-controlled trial of ADA in patients with moderate to
1987-revised criteria and moderately to severely active
Table 2. Radiographic Progression From Baseline Figure 5. Percentages of Patients Achieving Table 3. Overview of Adverse Events: All Patients
received ADA + MTX from the start of the study (6.2 vs 0.7;
severe RA who demonstrated an inadequate response to
disease despite a minimum of 3 months of treatment with
To obtain time-averaged disease activity, areas under
to Year 10 in Patients Whose Disease Activity Was Comprehensive Disease Control (Clinical + With at Least 1 ADA Injectiona P = .002) (Figure 4A)
MTX1 (Figure 1)
MTX at weekly doses of 12.5–25 mg, plus:
the curve (AUC) were determined for all time intervals of
in Remission During the Open-label Extension Functional + Radiographic) Following Up to 10 PY = 3089.2
available DAS28(CRP) or SDAI values from Year 1 through
– Patients continuing weekly MTX were randomized 1:1:1 to
– Tender joint count ≥9 out of 68 assessed joints
Years of Treatment With ADA + MTX Events (Events/100 PY)
Year 10 for individual patients. Values were summed and
P valuea
receive weekly PBO, weekly ADA 20 mg, or ADA 40 mg
– Swollen joint count ≥6 out of 66 assessed joints
– C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥1.0 mg/dL
Conclusions Acknowledgements
– Patients completing the 1-year blinded study were
Comprehensive Disease Control
– Rheumatoid factor positive, or at least 1 joint erosion
TA-DAS28(CRP) <2.6, but not TA-SDAI ≤3.3
eligible to receive OL ADA 40 mg eow + MTX for up to
• Comprehensive disease control was defi ned as DAS28(CRP)
AE leading to discontinuation of study drug
Clinical and Functional Assessments
• Following up to 10 years of treatment
Abbott sponsored the study (NCT00195702). The authors wish
<3.2 or DAS28(CRP) <2.6 PLUS HAQ-DI <0.5 PLUS
to acknowledge Benjamin Wolfe, Ph.D., of Abbott, for his
“Delayed ADA” – patients who received PBO + MTX
• Clinical assessments included 50%, 70%, and 90%
assistance with the preparation of this poster.
during the blinded study before entering the OL extension
responses in the American College of Rheumatology criteria
– The percentages of patients achieving comprehensive
TA-DAS28(CRP) <2.6, but not TA-SDAI ≤3.3
(ACR50, ACR70, and ACR90), the 28-joint disease activity
“Initial ADA” – patients who received ADA + MTX
disease control at Year 10 were determined
Opportunistic infection (excluding tuberculosis)
score with CRP [DAS28(CRP)], and the simplifi ed disease
Disclosures P value for differences in ΔmTSS between TA-DAS28(CRP) <2.6 and TA-SDAI ≤3.3. Figure 1. DE019 Trial Design
– Low disease activity (LDA) was defi ned as
• Adverse events (AEs) were assessed throughout the study
ΔmTSS, change in modifi ed total Sharp score; TA, time-averaged; DAS28, 28-joint disease
Malignant AE (excluding NMSC and lymphoma)
activity score; CRP, C-reactive protein; SDAI, simplifi ed disease activity index.
ECK has received consulting fees or other remuneration from
Randomization Blinded Study Open-label Extension
and were summarized for all patients exposed to ADA as both
Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Centocor, Genzyme,
the number and percentage of patients affected as well as the
• Regardless of original treatment group, patients whose
– Remission was defi ned as DAS28(CRP) <2.6 or SDAI ≤3.3
Merck, Novartis, Pfi zer, and UCB, and research grants from
number of events per 100 patient-years of exposure
time-averaged disease activity during the OL extension met
• Physical function was assessed through the disability index
Abbott, AstraZeneca, Biotest, BMS, Centocor, Genentech,
DAS28(CRP), but not SDAI, remission criteria or met SDAI
of the health assessment questionnaire (HAQ-DI)
Statistical Analyses
Merck, Nycomed, Pfi zer, Roche, and UCB. DvdH has received
remission criteria had similar levels of radiographic progression
“Delayed ADA” patients received PBO + MTX during year 1; “initial ADA” patients received ADA
– Normal physical function was defi ned as HAQ-DI <0.5
• Clinical and functional outcomes were summarized as
at Year 10 (Table 2)
aAny AE with an onset date on or after the day of the fi rst ADA injection through 70 days after the
consulting fees or other remuneration from Abbott, Amgen,
Open-label
AstraZeneca, BMS, Centocor, Chugai, Merck, Novartis, Otsuka,
ADA 40 mg eow Radiographic Assessments Comprehensive Disease Control at Year 10
ADA, adalimumab; PY, patient-years; AE, adverse event; NMSC, nonmelanoma skin cancer.
Pfi zer, Roche, Sanofi -Aventis, Schering-Plough, UCB, and
– AUC analysis was used to assess cumulative differences
• Two radiologists, blinded to patient and sequence, scored
Wyeth. MEW has received research grants and consulting fees
• Signifi cantly more patients from the “initial ADA” group
fi lms of the hands and feet using the modifi ed total Sharp
Long-Term Safety
or other remuneration from Abbott. AK has received research
achieved comprehensive disease control at Year 10 compared
• Radiographic assessments were analyzed according to
score (mTSS, range 0−398) to assess joint erosion (JE, range
with patients in the “delayed ADA” group (Figure 5)
• A total of 553 patients received at least 1 injection of ADA,
grants from Abbott. NM, BG, HK, and SL are all full-time
original treatment group for all patients with x-rays available
0−230) and joint space narrowing (JSN, range 0−168)
with a mean exposure of 5.6 years, totaling 3089-patient-
employees of Abbott and may hold stock or stock options.
years of exposure; no new safety signals were identifi ed
– Mean changes (Δ) in mTSS, JE, and JSN from Baseline to
– Differences in mean ΔmTSS between original treatment
following up to 10 years of ADA exposure (Table 3)
groups were assessed using a constrained longitudinal
12.5–25 mg weekly; patients must have been on a stable dose for at least 4 weeks prior
– Radiographic nonprogression was defi ned as ΔmTSS ≤0.5
• The SMR (95% confi dence interval) was 0.77 (0.52, 1.10),
References
data analysis (cLDA), following adjustment for the observed
indicating an observed number of deaths (n = 24) that
– Minimal radiographic progression was defi ned as ΔmTSS
was numerically lower than that expected in an age-,
1. Keystone, E., et al. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50(5):1400−11.
• A standardized mortality ratio (SMR), defi ned as the ratio of
≤5 at Year 10 (average of 0.5 per year over 10 years)
observed to expected deaths was calculated based on the
2. Keystone, E., et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69(6):1129−35.
– Observed changes in mTSS from Baseline and from Year 1
Work Health Organization age-, sex-, and country-specifi c
through Year 10 were plotted as cumulative probabilities
3. Keystone, E., et al. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58(11):3319−29.
4. Lipsky, P.E., et al. N Eng J Med. 2000;343(22):1594−602.
5. Weinblatt, M.E., et al. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;48(1):35−45. Presented at 2011 ACR/ARHP Annual Scientifi c Meeting in Chicago, Illinois, United States, November 5–9, 2011
6. Weinblatt, M.E., et al. N Eng J Med. 1999;340(4):253−9.
The life-affirming sounds quieted. My mother stood at the foot ofthe bed, blanch-faced. My husband yelled for a doctor, any doctor. “Ohmy God, I killed my baby!” I first thought. The anesthesiologist chargedin and immediately started CPR on my baby boy—Kenny. I listened tothe murmurs that his eyes had opened and he looked around but hadshallow and ragged breath. Thank God. He was alive. Gr
Pension application of John Hall S30451 [Methodology: Spelling, punctuation and/or grammar have been corrected in some instances for ease of reading and to facilitate searches of the database. Also, the handwriting of the original scribes often lends itself to varying interpretations. Users of this database are urged to view the original and to make their own decision as to how to decipher what