Suomen sivusto, jossa voit ostaa halvalla ja laadukas Viagra http://osta-apteekki.com/ toimitus kaikkialle maailmaan.

Yritti äskettäin viagra, se toimii erittäin tehokkaasti)) Ostaa Internetin kautta täällä priligy Myös ostaa levitra oikeudenkäynti, vaikutus on silmiinpistävää.

X-8540-510

Nurse Practitioners and Medical Malpractice CASE STUDY WITH RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES Presented by NSO and CNA
Medical malpractice extends to every healthcare profession including nurse practitioners. As nurse practitioners
assume an expanded role in the healthcare industry, related legal issues increase. As a result, nurse
practitioners are more frequently being named in medical malpractice litigation. According to CNA HealthPro’s
and NSO’s 2009 nurse practitioner claims study encompassing ten years of nurse practitioner claim data, over
$64.8 million was paid for medical malpractice claims on behalf of nurse practitioners.*
Case Study: Failure to Assess Resident and Failure to Inform
the Physician of Resident’s Unstable Condition Mediated Settlement Payment: $450,000
Legal Expenses: $181,225
Note: There were multiple co-defendants in this claim who
to 8:00 a.m. to the nurse practitioner. The nurse practitioner are not discussed in this scenario. While there may have been was also expected to make resident visits as needed to assess errors/negligent acts on the part of other defendants, the case, comments, and recommendations are limited to the actions of On day one of the case, the nursing home physician ordered the defendant; the nurse practitioner.
that the resident be started on Bactrim for a bladder infection.
This case involves the treatment and subsequent death of a The nursing home staff correctly questioned the order, since 78-year-old female resident of a nursing home. She had a Bactrim has the potential to adversely react with the blood number of medical conditions including hypertension, chronic thinner Coumadin but the nursing home physician continued anemia, chronic renal failure, congestive heart failure and the order. The resident also took daily doses of ibuprofen for morbid obesity. She was prescribed the anti-coagulant drug pain which may further increase the risk of bleeding. On day Coumadin because of atrial fibrillation and the related risk of two, the resident’s laboratory test results showed no bladder infection, however, the Bactrim was not discontinued.
The nursing home physician (who was also the president and On day six, the resident’s laboratory tests showed that her medical director of the nursing home) contracted with a bleeding time had increased and that she was at risk of bleeding physician-owned healthcare staffing agency where the from the Coumadin. Documentation is unclear whether any of physician owner was also the agency’s medical director. The the three practitioners were notified of the resident’s increased nurse practitioner defendant was employed by the physician- bleeding time. On day eight, the resident began bleeding from owned healthcare staffing agency and was assigned to the her gastrointestinal tract. The nurse practitioner was notified nursing home to provide telephonic on-call resident care and provided orders to stop the Coumadin for two days and to services, emergency telephone resident services and on-site recheck the resident’s blood tests on day eleven. It was alleged on day 10 that the nurse practitioner was notified by the nursing home staff that the resident had blood clots in her All three practitioners were involved in the case involving the stools, but the nurse practitioner has no recollection of being decedent plaintiff. For purposes of this discussion, the nursing told this and maintained no documentation regarding the home physician/president/medical director will be referred to as the nursing home physician. The contracted staffing agency physician-owner and medical director will be referred to and The nurse practitioner stated that it was her custom and the agency physician and the nurse practitioner defendant will practice after each call from the nursing home, to fax her on- be referred to as the nurse practitioner. The complex call report for the nursing home physician to the nursing home arrangement for the provision of resident services at the nursing fax number. Since the nurse practitioner responded to resident home is a significant contributing factor in the events leading calls outside of normal business hours, it is reasonable to assume that the nursing home physician would not receive the fax until the next time he was physically present in the nursing As noted above, the nurse practitioner was employed by the home. The nurse practitioner stated that she did not keep contracted staffing agency to provide on-call services to the copies of the reports or her notes made during calls from the nursing home and its residents. The nursing home physician nursing home. The nursing home physician denied receiving delegated the responsibility to respond to all patient care calls the defendant’s faxed on-call reports.
from the nursing home staff on week day evenings from 5:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m., on weekends from 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.
and for emergent pager calls during the week from 10:00 p.m.
The resident continued to bleed through days nine, 10 and According to the defense team’s claim consultants, the nurse 11. The nurse practitioner and the nursing home physician practitioner made a very credible witness. The defense team were notified of the continued bleeding but neither modified engaged numerous experts to defend her including a forensic the resident’s care plan. The nursing staff notes reflect that pathologist, gastroenterologist, toxicologist, hepatologist, the resident was dizzy and nauseated but there is no evidence physician and two nurse practitioners. The defense argued that the chain of command was utilized to involve nursing that the nurse practitioner was within the standard of care leadership in obtaining treatment for the resident. The when responding to a telephone triage call by ordering that morning of day 11, the resident was found to have expired in the Coumadin be discontinued for two days and ordering a her bed. Subsequently, an autopsy was performed by the state’s follow-up laboratory test of the resident’s bleeding time.
Medical Investigator’s Office with the determination that the The plaintiff experts argued that the nurse practitioner resident bled to death from a gastrointestinal hemorrhage.
should have obtained vital signs, medications, current The daughter of the deceased sought damages and sued the problem list, past medical history and laboratory studies. She nursing home, the nursing home physician, the contracted should further have stopped the resident's Bactrim and staffing agency, the agency physician and the nurse ibuprofen, identified her anemia and ordered ‘STAT’ practitioner. The allegations against the nurse practitioner laboratory tests. If the nurse practitioner felt she did not have a clear understanding of the resident's condition, she should • failure to evaluate, monitor and treat the resident's have ordered that the resident be transferred to the hospital or she should have gone to the facility to personally examine her. Plaintiff’s experts indicated that it was the nurse • failure to timely contact the nursing home physician practitioner’s responsibility to order and obtain the information she needed to make an appropriate assessment • exceeding her scope of practice by making medical of the resident’s condition rather than to wait for decisions about the resident’s bleeding Resolution
After two and one-half years, the claim against the nurse practitioner settled at mediation for $450,000, and an additional
$181,225 in legal expenses were paid. The physicians, nursing home and the staffing agency also settled the actions against them at mediation. The amount of the additional settlements is not available.
Risk Management Comments
The daily responsibility for the clinical care of this resident was fragmented among multiple practitioners. Accountability and communication channels were unclear. It appears that the nursing home physician, agency physician and the nurse practitioner all contributed directly or indirectly to the resident’s care at some point with no one professional acting as the primary care provider with responsibility for the oversight of the resident’s unstable and rapidly failing condition. The nursing staff identified the potential for adverse interaction of the resident’s medications but their concerns were not heeded. There is no evidence that the nursing staff persisted through the nursing chain of command regarding their concerns and the resident continued to receive the Bactrim and ibuprofen even after the Coumadin was discontinued.
The role of the dispensing pharmacist in this resident’s medication regime is unclear as the combination of medications had obvious contraindications and should have been reported to the nursing home physician (ordering physician) and clarified before being supplied to the nursing home by the pharmacist.
The nurse practitioner never actually visited the resident during the period in question. She indicated that she had faxed information regarding clinical symptoms reported by nursing staff and laboratory findings for this resident to the nursing home physician. However, the nurse practitioner retained no copies of the faxed documents and made no entries into the resident’s health record. The nurse practitioner performed no follow-up actions to determine if the nursing home physician timely received the faxed information in order to adjust the resident’s care accordingly. The nurse practitioner maintained no notes related to her conversations with nursing home staff nor did she document her clinical decision-making process in any format.
The nurse practitioner failed to physically assess the resident, failed to actively seek out the results of laboratory tests and when provided with clinical evidence of abnormal bleeding times and visible gastrointestinal bleeding, failed to order the resident’s Without knowing the results of the claim against the additional defendants in this case, it would appear that many disciplines failed to communicate effectively and that oversight for this resident’s care was not properly maintained by any individual practitioner.
Risk Management Recommendations
The role and scope of clinical practice of a nurse practitioner in any clinical setting (whether employed or contracted) must be clearly defined and understood among all involved parties including: direct resident/patient care nursing staff attending, consulting and contracted physicians dispensing pharmacist and consulting pharmacist The contract defining the responsibilities of nurse practitioners providing on-call coverage for resident/patient care should specify under what conditions the nurse practitioner is allowed/required to visit the resident/patient rather than Communication between the nurse practitioner and any other party regarding the resident’s/patient’s care is to be documented in a pre-defined, consistent, confidential manner and retained where it is readily available to the members Verbal and telephone communication must be timely documented in the resident/patient health record. Each resident/patient must have an identified attending physician who is ultimately responsible for the overall clinical decision-making in determining the resident’s/patient’s care and treatment.
On-call practitioners of all types should be required to physically assess a resident/patient in need if the attending physician is not available and the resident’s/patient’s condition is unstable or deteriorating.
Practitioners of all types should be prohibited from faxing information without providing original documentation in the resident’s/patient’s health record within 24 hours.
Practitioners of all types should refrain from providing orders and advice regarding complex or unstable residents/patients without obtaining full information regarding the resident’s diagnoses, medications, response to treatment and on-going clinical monitoring results. If such information is not readily available, the unstable resident/patient should be transported to a hospital for acute and immediate care.
Guide to Sample Risk Management Plan
Risk Management is an integral part of a healthcare professional’s standard business practice. Risk management activities include identifying and evaluating risks, followed by implementing the most advantageous methods of reducing or eliminating these risks - A good Risk Management Plan will help you perform these steps quickly and easily! Visit www.nso.com/riskplan to access the Risk Management plan created by NSO and CNA. We encourage you to use this
as a guide to develop your own risk management plan to meet the specific needs of your healthcare practice.
*Understanding Nurse Practitioner Liability: CNA HealthPro Nurse Practitioner Claims Analysis 1998-2008, Risk Management Strategies and Highlights of the 2009 NSO Survey, CNA InsuranceCompany, December 2009. To read the complete study visit www.nso.com/NPclaimstudy2009 This publication is for educational purposes. It is not legal, professional or medical advice. CNA makes no representations as to its correctness or completeness and accepts no liability for anyinjury or damage that may arise from its use. Specific legal or medical questions should be referred to a competent attorney or medical professional before applying this material in any particularfactual situations. This material may address and discuss matters for which your policy does not provide coverage, and the material does not create or imply the existence of coverage. Pleaseconsult your insurance policy for the specific terms, coverages, amounts, conditions and exclusions of coverage. All products and services may not be available in all states and may not beavailable in all states and may be subject to change without notice. CNA policies are underwritten by the property/casualty companies of CNA, Chicago, IL. CNA is a registered trademark of CNAFinancial Corporation. 2010 Continental Casualty Company. All rights reserved. This publication is intended to inform Affinity Insurance Services, Inc., customers of potential liability in their practice. It reflects general principles only. It is not intended to offer legal advice or toestablish appropriate or acceptable standards of professional conduct. Readers should consult with a lawyer if they have specific concerns. Neither Affinity Insurance Services, Inc., NSO, nor CNAassumes any liability for how this information is applied in practice or for the accuracy of this information. This publication is published by Affinity Insurance Services, Inc., with headquarters at159 East County Line Road, Hatboro, PA 19040-1218. Phone: (215) 773-4600. All world rights reserved. Reproduction without permission is prohibited.
Nurses Service Organization is a registered trade name of Affinity Insurance Services, Inc.; in CA (License #0795465), MN and OK, AIS Affinity Insurance Agency, Inc.; and in NY, AIS AffinityInsurance Agency. 2010 Affinity Insurance Services, Inc.

Source: http://www.nso.com/pdfs/db/NP_SLCS_x-8610-710_final_web.pdf?fileName=NP_SLCS_x-8610-710_final_web.pdf&folder=pdfs/db&isLiveStr=Y

entomology.umn.edu

Contents Insecticide For Use by Individuals/Firms licensed by the State FIRST AID to apply insecticide products. If swallowed • Call poison control center or doctor immediately For use to control insect pests on lawns, ornamen- • Do not induce vomiting unless told to do so by the tal trees and shrubs and around buildings for perimeter insect control including landscape

Microsoft word - 2009 diabetes pap nni internet application- spanish.doc

Programa de asistencia para pacientes de Novo Nordisk PO Box 181640 Louisville, KY 40261 Teléfono: 866-310-7549 Fax: 866-441-4190 Instrucciones: Por favor, asegúrese de completar las dos paginas de esta solicitud. Las solicitudes incompletas serán devueltas. · Por favor, calcule hasta 10 días laborables para procesamiento y envío del medicamento a la oficina del pr

Copyright © 2010-2014 Medical Pdf Articles