To: Distributors and holders of ProFund Notes ProFund Notes In the following, we provide answers to some questions which apply generally to the ProFund Notes, but holders should be aware that each series of ProFund Notes is different and the status of their series may therefore differ in some respects from the general answers given here. The structure of the ProFund Notes and the rights
Suomen sivusto, jossa voit ostaa halvalla ja laadukas Viagra http://osta-apteekki.com/ toimitus kaikkialle maailmaan.
Erityisesti laatu viagra tästä kaupasta voi taata henkilökohtaisesti propecia Paras laatu kehotan Teitä miellyttää.
Microsoft word - angerreview.01.27.2004.docAnger: definition, health consequences, and treatment approaches. *Laboratory of Biological Dynamics and Theoretical Medicine § Veterans Affairs San Diego Health Care System In this review, four main aspects of anger are discussed. First, the definition and measurement of anger is examined; second, the neurobiological basis for anger and its expression is outlined; third, health consequences are summarized; and fourth treatment approaches are outlined. Based upon this review, it is evident that anger is a very important emotion and is different from aggression, although many confuse one with the other. Anger, with or without aggression, has been shown to have devastating health consequences, but may be amenable to several treatment modalities, including medication approaches. Well-controlled prospective studies will be necessary to determine the best treatment approaches and their effects on health consequences in the future. Emotions play an organizing role in an individual’s experience of reality, sense of self, and orientation toward others (107). Anger is a complex emotion and occurs as a result of an interaction between one or more eliciting events, the individual’s pre-anger state, appraisals of the eliciting events, and available coping resources (33). In the broader sense, anger is composed of interrelated elements of cynical beliefs and attributions, angry emotional states, and aggressive or antagonistic behaviors (90). In a narrower sense, however, anger describes the affective experience, which can range from mild annoyance to fury and outrage, and can be differentiated from hostility, which refers to a person's tendency to view the world in a negative, cynical fashion, or aggression, which is used to describe destructive and violent behavior. This triad of anger, hostility, and aggression has been referred to as the “AHA” (anger, hostility, aggression) structure (137) and is also summarized as the “ABC” structure of trait anger, i.e. “Angry Affect”, “Behavioral Aggression”, and “Cynical Cognition” (90). Anger can be elicited by specific events, behaviors of others, and one’s own behavior, or a combination of external events and anger-related memories. Anger can also be elicited by thoughts and feelings that are associated with memories or anticipation of anger. A pre-anger state is often critical for the expression of anger and consists of the immediate feeling preceding the anger situation. This pre-anger state frequently emerges when a person is in an aversive emotional or physical situation, his/her identity is challenged, or if expectations or desires are not met. The basis for the pre-anger state as well as the basis of an angry response is often entrenched in personal identity, frequently represents consequences of traumatic life history, and can be associated with both Axis I and Axis II disorders (118) Factors affecting anger prevalence and presentation The precise prevalence of anger related problems is unknown, however, in a large epidemiological study, about 15% of individuals reported extremely high hostility scores (119). Some investigators have shown that problems associated with anger do not seem to vary significantly with age (14) but are inversely related to education (125). Higher levels of trait anger have been reported in younger individuals, African Americans, and in males (125). A range of factors ranging from social to genetic has been found to significantly affect the prevalence of anger. There is a strong connection between observed aggressive parenting and subsequent aggressive parenting in the offspring generation, which seems to suggest that anger/aggression is passed on via parenting styles from one generation to the next (24). This finding is consistent with the observation that hostility aggregates in families (91). Both negative life events and lack of social support were associated with higher hostility scores (125). Some have raised the issue of gender-specific expression of anger. Specifically, physical and verbal antagonism was found more frequently in men while more women reported passive consent (12). More recent evidence points to a specific genetic influence on anger prevalence, e.g. relative to the L allele presence of any U allele in the tryptophan hydroxylase gene was associated with a higher likelihood of outward expression of anger (87), which has been replicated in a different sample (121). Thus, the modulation of anger is multifactorial and involves gender-specific effects, genetic background, and family environment. Among the most frequently reported anger situations is road rage. Anger expressions during road rage have been categorized into verbal or physical aggressive expression (34). In a recent survey, about 50% of driving individuals reported being shouted at, cursed at or had rude gestures directed at them in the past year. About 7% of respondents were threatened with damage to their vehicle or personal injury by others. Moreover, nearly a third of respondents admitted to shouting or cursing at someone (130). Relative to other common daily activities, anger was more likely to occur while driving (108). After controlling for gender, age, driving frequency, and annual miles driven, verbal expression, an angry/threatening driving subscale of road rage was significantly associated with hazardous driving behaviors including frequency of driving over the legal blood alcohol limit, receipt of tickets in the past year, and habitually exceeding the speed limit as well as being involved in a motor vehicle accident (MVA) (155). This is consistent with reports that in driving simulations, high anger drivers were twice as likely to become involved in a MVA while under a There are many scales and assessment tools currently used in anger studies; however, only three of the more widely used measures will be discussed here. The most widely used anger scale, with extensive normative data and predictive validity, is a paper-and-pencil measure devised by Spielberger and colleagues: the State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory (STAXI) (47;137). The STAXI is a 44- item scale that measures anger experience, expression, and control (92). The STAXI has several factors: State Anger (S-Anger); Trait Anger Temperament and Reaction; and Anger-In, Anger-Out, and Anger-Control. More recently, a “feeling like expressing anger” factor has been added to augment the original model (47). The most frequently used distinction, Anger-Out versus Anger-In, refers to the tendency to focus angry expression outward on other people or objects versus directed inward towards oneself, respectively. Further analyses using this scale revealed seven additional forms of anger expression: Noisy Arguing, Verbal Assault, Physical Assault-People, Physical Assault-Objects, Reciprocal Communication, Time Out, and Direct Expression (35). Interestingly, the STAXI was not effective in accurately classifying subjects as high and low in self-report of aggressive behavior (152). Thus, measuring angry feelings may not appropriately predict aggressive behavior. Alternatively, the Buss Durkee Hostility Inventory (BDHI)(18) has been used widely, and its reliability and factor structure have been validated repeatedly (11). While the BDHI has better reliability than other anger scales and possesses some ability to predict the experience of anger, most of the BDHI subscales do not measure specific states or behavior (13). Finally, the Cook and Medley Hostility (Ho)(25) scale has been widely used in studies with cardiac patients (see below) and shows good convergent and discriminant validity. This scale primarily assesses suspiciousness, resentment, frequent anger, and cynical distrust of others rather than overtly aggressive behavior or general emotional distress. Moreover, subjects with high scores high exhibited a particularly unhealthy psychosocial risk profile (134). Drugs and Alcohol: High trait anger individuals report more drug and alcohol use (143). In women, hostility was associated with increased tobacco smoking, caffeine use, and the number of alcoholic beverages consumed (19). Moreover, individuals who report low levels of trait anger may be more resistant to the potentiating effects of alcohol on aggression (109). In youth, elevated levels of anger and irritability have been shown to predispose to subsequent use of Axis I: Anger and aggression are prominent in psychiatric outpatients (113). Relative to patients with anxiety disorders, depressed individuals had twice the prevalence of anger attacks, which was associated with more depressed symptoms (53). Others have found that increased levels of anger suppression have been associated with less improvement in depression (17). Anger problems have frequently been reported in individuals with PTSD (52). Higher prevalence of anger has also been reported for individuals with Attention- Axis II and Personality: Cluster B personality disorders contribute most prominently to the presence of both anger and aggression in psychiatric populations (113). For example, subjects with high levels of narcissism reported greater verbally expressed anger and males high in narcissism were more likely to express anger physically (93). In addition, anger has been linked to various personality traits and coping styles. For example, a higher level of anger as measured by the Ho scale was associated with increased levels of neuroticism, attentional overload, and interpersonal alienation (21). In contrast, self-control skills were inversely related to hostility, anger, and aggression (58). High-anger- arousal subjects were found to score lower on socialization, self-control, tolerance, psychological-mindedness, and flexibility (10). Moreover, in interpersonal conflict situations men with high levels of hostility responded with significant increases in self-reported anger and anxiety or overt hostile behavior and saw the disagreement-engendering behavior as more intentional (135). High impulsivity has also been related to high expression of anger feelings (43). Assertiveness and fear play an important role in the expression of anger. For example, individuals who express a high level of assertiveness expressed overt forms of more anger and aggression, whereas those with low level of assertiveness experienced more covert anger (38). Whereas fearful people expressed pessimistic risk estimates and risk-averse choices, angry people expressed optimistic risk estimates and risk-seeking choices (83). High Ho individuals report low covert self-esteem, avoid seeking or accepting social support, experience anger that is excessive and that occurs in a wide variety of situations, and suppress expression of anger, these individuals tend to drink more alcohol and drive a car more frequently after drinking and to have greater relative weight (60). Finally, very low ratings for spirituality was often associated with anger, pointlessness, selfishness, abandonment, and loneliness (54). In combination, although not a single personality factor predisposes to a high expression of anger, converging evidence suggests that neuroticism (a trait measure of fear), narcissism, impulsivity, low spiritualism is associated with The somatic marker hypothesis proposed by Damasio and colleagues (26) is a useful conceptual approach to understand the neurobiology of emotions in general, and anger specifically. The key idea is that “marker” signals, which are brain representations of “body states”, have critical influence on how individual respond to external stimuli. This influence takes place at multiple levels of operation, some of which occur overtly or consciously and some of which occur covertly or non-consciously. The marker signals arise as the result of bioregulatory processes, i.e. resolving the differences between information about the “body state” from the peripheral nervous system and the brain generated expectation of the current state. The markers are called somatic because they relate to body-state structure and regulation even when they do not arise in the body proper but rather in the brain's representation of the body (27). This view of multi-level bioregulatory processes underlying the modulation of anger and other emotions is consistent with some of the special, attentional features of emotional processing, i.e. the automaticity of fear and anger reactions, hyper-reactivity to minimal threat-cues, and the evidence that the physiological responses in anger may be independent of slower, language-based appraisal processes (78). Some investigators have posited that impulsive anger and aggression arise as a consequence of faulty emotion regulation (30). Particular emphasis has been placed on the prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate, parietal cortex, and the amygdala as critical components of the circuitry that may be dysfunctional in people with anger-related problems (29). In a recent review of the functional neuroimaging literature, the medial prefrontal cortex was found to have a general role in emotional processing. Whereas fear specifically engaged the amygdala, and sadness was associated with activity in the subcallosal cingulate. The emotional induction by visual stimuli activated the occipital cortex and the amygdala. In comparison, induction by emotional recall/imagery recruited the anterior cingulate and insula. Finally, emotional tasks with cognitive demand also involved the anterior cingulate and insula (112). Thus, a circuitry comprising the amygdala, anterior cingulate, and insula may be the key structures for the assessment and expression of anger. The study of the brain systems underlying the evaluation and expression of anger has been based primarily on how individuals view and process faces. The majority of the individuals when asked to look at a human face with standard emotional expressions choose to describe feeling states as the message, such as disgust, fear, sadness, happiness, and surprise. In comparison, anger display tends to elicit the expression of behavioral intention or action request, which is consistent with the view that facial expressions communicate feelings, intentions, and wishes (59). In experimental situations, facial displays of anger are often used as communicative tools even though there is no audience and the individual is not aware of it (67). Other studies have looked at how angry behavior is acquired. For example, anger responses can be acquired via associative learning even when the individuals are unaware of the conditioning process (41). The recognition of anger appears to depend on the intact right inferior parietal cortex and on the right mesial anterior infracalcarine cortex (2). The amygdala plays an important role in triggering knowledge related to threat and danger signaled by facial expressions (3). Bilateral amygdala activation is found during processing of threat words (62). Among the basic emotions, amygdala damage disrupts effective processing of anger and fear, in particular, the amygdala is critical for multi-modal appraisal of these emotions (126). Others have emphasized that the amygdala, in conjunction with other brain areas, supports the normal appraisal of auditory signals of danger (4). Apart from the amygdala, other cortical areas provide important top-down modulatory functioning for the expression of anger. For example, both anxiety and anger conditions were found to increase cerebral blood flow in left inferior frontal and left temporal pole regions (75). Some investigators have proposed a specific role of the posterior part of the right gyrus cinguli, and the medial temporal gyrus of the left hemisphere has been ascribed to the processing of angry faces (138). However others have found anger to be associated with activation of the left orbitofrontal cortex, right anterior cingulate cortex affective division, and bilateral anterior temporal poles (37). This finding is consistent with brain activation patterns associated with transgressions of social norms involving systems previously found to be related to angry responses, e.g. the lateral orbitofrontal cortex and medial prefrontal cortex (9). In comparison, guilt, an emotion often associated with anger, blood flow increases occurred in anterior paralimbic regions of the brain: bilateral anterior temporal poles, anterior cingulate gyrus, and left anterior insular cortex/inferior frontal gyrus (127). To summarize, the appraisal and expression of anger involves a distributed neural system, which involves limbic, para-limbic, and cortical areas. Although several studies have been conducted using facial processing to assess anger-related neural circuitry, there is a need to extend these findings to other situations such as cue-induced anger. Moreover, it is unknown whether this distributed neural system is altered Health consequences associated with anger Early investigations of health consequences associated with high trait anger were focused only on the cardiovascular system, but new evidence shows adverse health consequences on other important areas of functioning, which include Coronary artery disease and myocardial infarction (MI): Initially, increased MI prevalence had been linked to Type A personality, however, subsequent analyses supported the hypothesis that only anger and hostility may be the critical aspects of the Type A pattern in predisposing individuals to risk of coronary artery disease (36). Those individuals with high scores on the MMPI Ho scale had greater mortality risk, which remained significant even after controlling for age, sex, physician's ratings of functional health, smoking, cholesterol, and alcohol intake (7). Other investigators have proposed that poor health habits of high hostility individuals may be another pathway from high anger to subsequent disease (82). For example, in both men and women, measures of hostility were positively associated with increased cholesterol intake and less vigorous physical activity. Among women, hostility measures were positively related to animal fat intake and negatively related to fiber intake (97). Moreover, a multivariate analysis in women revealed that 25% of the variance of improper health maintenance behavior was accounted for by hostility, low education, and the combination of high anger experience and outward expression of anger (70). There is now robust empirical evidence linking emotional disturbances such as anxiety, depression and anger to coronary heart disease (146). Hostile affect and depression predict long-term cardiac-related mortality following an MI independently of each other and independent of cardiac disease severity (48). In addition, persuasive clinical evidence indicates that anger evokes physiological responses that are potentially life threatening in individuals with coronary artery disease. In combination, emotional stress, anger, and worry have a profound influence on the severity, frequency, and treatment responsiveness in coronary artery disease (50). For example, relative to individuals with low levels of anger, subjects with the highest level of anger in a coronary high-risk group were associated with a 3 times increased risk of premature coronary vascular disease, including 3.5 times higher risk of premature coronary heart disease and 6.4 times higher risk of premature MI (22). Other risk estimates, after controlling for age, education, body mass index, exercise, smoking history, and alcohol consumption, indicate that hostility was associated with a 1.3 to 2.2 increased risk for a history of coronary bypass surgery or coronary angioplasty and a history of MI in high-risk women (76;157). In an attempt to quantify the acute effects of anger on coronary artery disease, investigators monitored subjects continuously and found that during a 1-hour period after an episode of anger, with an intensity of at least "very angry," the relative risk of having an MI was 9.0 times higher. When restricting the analysis to subjects who were identifying an anger episode within the hour, the trigger risk was found to be 16 times higher (96). In evocative situations, harassment produced increases in self-rated anger, irritation, and tension, but it was only among those subjects with high Ho scores that increased anger and irritation were associated with enhanced cardiovascular arousal (140). Others have suggested that situations, which evoke suspiciousness and mistrust, rather than anger in general, may be critical for the increased blood pressure reactivity among angry individuals (154). However, some studies have been unable to replicate the association between hostility and coronary artery disease mortality, morbidity, or total mortality either before or after adjustment for baseline risk factors (57). For example, responses of MI patients and controls to questions about stair climbing, irritability and mood were virtually identical (8). Some have proposed that social isolation, a poor self- rated health status and ventricular irritability are equally strong predictors of mortality in a group of patients with ischemic heart disease (106). Reviewing the literature, Smith et al. (132) emphasized that there are important inter-individual differences among angry persons and that the social context plays an important role in the effects of hostility on health. Finally, aside from coronary artery disease, anger can affect the heart in other ways. For example, anger can trigger ventricular arrhythmias (77) and can lead to greater heart rate reactivity to Several studies in the late 1970s related levels of anger to hypertension (85;86;88;89). Both, hostility and anxiety may precede the diagnosis of high blood pressure (136) and correlate with concurrent blood pressure levels (69). The effects of anger may be particularly pronounced in individuals with more labile blood pressure (64;128). Compared to low hostility subjects, individuals with high levels of anger displayed larger systolic and diastolic blood pressure responses (133). Conversely, subjects, who show an association between heart rate and mood variations were more anxious, reported more anger, and had higher systolic blood pressures (71). In addition, perceived stress affects both systolic and diastolic blood pressure as well as heart rate (79). Even in children, multivariate analyses revealed that expressive hostility was positively associated However, some studies have not confirmed the relationship between hostility and increased blood pressure (123;131). This may be due to individual differences such as physiological reactivity, family history, race and gender (40), specific anger styles, or how subjects cope with anger. For example, African Americans relative to Caucasians show longer-lasting blood pressure reactivity to anger (49). Moreover in subjects with a parental history of hypertension, systolic blood pressure reactivity was associated with low irritability, while for persons without a parental history of hypertension, systolic blood pressure reactivity was associated with high scores for irritability (72). In another study, high levels of antagonistic hostility but not neurotic hostility were significantly associated with greater systolic blood pressure and poorer recovery to harassment (141). Similarly, individuals who show a high outward expression of anger showed exaggerated diastolic blood pressure response in contrast to those participants who “held their anger in” (142). Also, when monitoring ambulatory indices of cardiac function, subjects who were high in both defensiveness and hostility showed heart rate responses approximately 10 beats per minute higher and increases in diastolic blood pressure when compared to subjects who were high in hostility but low in defensiveness (65). Defensiveness during anger episodes was positively related to diastolic blood pressure reactivity (110). Finally, relative to individuals who do not talk about their anger, those who do have less problems with systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, body mass index, exhibit higher levels of aerobic exercise, perceive health as more important and show a better health status (148). In summary, there is moderate support for psychological factors as predictors for the development of hypertension and anger appears to be the strongest predictor (122). Several recent studies have shown a highly significant association between anger and risk for stroke. For example, men who reported the highest level of expressed anger relative to those with low levels of anger were at twice the risk of stroke even after adjustments for age, resting blood pressure, smoking, alcohol consumption, body mass index, low-density and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, fibrinogen, socioeconomic status, history of diabetes, and use of antihypertensives. Additional analyses showed that these associations were particularly evident in men with a history of ischemic heart disease. In these individuals, outwardly expressed anger predicted greater than 6-fold increased risk of stroke after risk factor adjustment (42). In another study, individuals younger than 60 years of age with high trait anger were at 3-fold higher risk for hemorrhagic and ischemic strokes relative to those who reported having low trait anger (156). Finally, anger can also be a consequence of a stroke. Specifically, inability to control anger or aggression has been closely related to lesions affecting frontal-lenticulocapsular-pontine base areas (74). Anger levels also affect metabolic processes. For example, individuals with a general tendency to either always express or always inhibit the expression of anger show higher triglyceride reactivity, relative to those with a more flexible style of anger expression (46). In women, high hostility scores are associated with greater body mass index, higher levels of serum triglycerides, fewer high- density lipoprotein cholesterol, poorer self-rated general health, and less education (23). Moreover, individuals with impulsive anger-out had heightened glucose levels and a more negative lipid profile of high total serum cholesterol, low density lipoproteins, and triglyceride levels, as well as heightened glucose levels (129). In a multivariate analysis, only hostility levels predicted low high- density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (98). Finally, the disposition to experience and express anger when frustrated, criticized, or treated unfairly has been related to increased total serum cholesterol and to low-density lipoprotein levels (115). Anger stands out as one of the most salient emotional correlates of pain, even though past research has been largely confined to the study of depression and anxiety (45). Multiple regression analyses revealed that a style of inhibiting the expression of angry feelings was the strongest predictor of reports of pain intensity and pain behavior among a group of variables including demographics, pain history, depression, anger intensity, and other styles of anger expression. Moreover, anger intensity contributes to predictions of perceived pain interference and pain-related reduction in activity level (73). Some have argued that pain adversely impacts mood rather than considering negative mood as a predisposing factor in the development of chronic pain (51). Others have shown that pain threshold and tolerance were lower in individuals with increased anger (68). Consistent with this view, anger management style and hostility contribute to the exacerbation of chronic low back pain (16). It has been proposed that anger-in and anger-out affect pain sensitivity through different mechanisms, i.e. only the effects of anger-out may be mediated by endogenous opioid dysfunction (15). Finally, anger toward oneself was significantly associated with pain and depression, whereas only overall anger was significantly related to perceived disability (105). Individuals who report problems with headaches relative to those without have higher scores measuring the tendency to “hold anger in” even after controlling for levels of trait anger, depression, and anxiety (99). Others have reported that subjects with migraine reported elevated aggression-hostility (20). These findings suggest that anger-related coping strategies are closely associated with Extremely low anger scores have been noted in several studies of patients with cancer. Such low scores suggest suppression, repression, or restraint of anger. Some investigators have suggested that suppressed anger is a psychological risk factor for the development of cancer, and also a factor in its progression after diagnosis (149). Behavioral oncologists have similarly attempted at conceptualizing a "Type C" or biopsychosocial cancer risk pattern, as they have noted the denial and suppression of emotions, in particular anger. This personality profile has been referred to as "pathological niceness" and is characterized by avoidance of conflicts, exaggerated social desirability, harmonizing behavior, over-compliance, over-patience, as well as high rationality and a rigid control of emotional expression. This pattern, usually concealed behind a facade of pleasantness, appears to be effective as long as environmental and psychological homeostasis is maintained, but collapses in the course of time under the impact of accumulated strains and stressors, especially those evoking feelings of depression and reactions of helplessness and This proposed “Type C personality” is consistent with findings in a longitudinal study of anger among cancer patients and their caregivers, who showed low, stable anger scores for both patients and their caregivers (145). Women patients with cancer reported lower scores than healthy women on total hostility, but men patients reported higher scores than healthy men. Introverted hostility was increased in both male and female patients, but due to different patterns: in women, the increase was due to lower scores on extroverted hostility subscales, especially acting-out hostility, whereas in men, the increase was due to higher scores on introverted hostility subscales, especially guilt (5). Thus, one of the main characteristics of a personality prone to cancer is either the repression or the inability to express or feel anger (84). However, others have found that in a large epidemiological study, overall emotional control and emotional control of anger and of anxiety were not convincingly related to cancer risk (150), or cancer outcome (104). In summary, these findings indicate that both low and high anger may have adverse health effects. However, future studies are necessary to better delineate the effects of anger or the lack of expression of anger on Anger levels have been related to several biochemical and molecular markers, which are relevant for key disease processes. For example, high levels of anger have been related directly to elevated cortisol secretion during normal daily activities (153). On a cellular level, hostility and aggression are associated with an increased expression of cytokines implicated in coronary vascular disease (139). Similarly, natural killer cell activity was significantly higher in the CHD group than the normal control and was significantly elevated by the suppression Clinicians and researchers agree that anger represents one of the most challenging emotions encounter in psychotherapy and treatment (100). An important impediment to the future success of anger management is the failure to fully address the issue of treatment readiness (61). Systematic Desensitization has been used in various studies to address problems of anger dyscontrol (103;117). Its efficacy, however, has been questioned (1). Several studies have been published that utilize cognitive behavioral strategies (56;94). Using this treatment approach, investigators found that subjects in a negative-thought- reduction and meditation group versus placebo showed improvement in trait anger, anger aroused through high-anger situations, anger scores across a wide variety of situations, unconstructive coping, and anger measured through physiological symptoms (39). Moreover, the gains made through intervention were maintained at a 6-week follow-up (39). Anger management treatment subjects exhibited significantly more assertiveness skills and lesser diastolic blood pressure reactivity at post treatment than their control counterparts. This was demonstrated during a confrontive interaction but not during the neutral role-play interaction (80). Others have proposed relaxation techniques as a main focus in anger management (102;111). Relaxation treatment combined with education about good psychological health maintenance behavior lowered blood pressure more than did hygiene alone. Neither treatment favorably affected a paper-and-pencil measure of anger but relaxation did lower anger-hostility on a new cognitive assessment procedure (31). In comparison, the main intervention principle in emotionally focused therapy is attention to the subject’s present subjective experience. This type of therapy first establishes an alliance with the patient, evokes core emotions and explores bad feelings, and aids in the restructuring of maladaptive emotion and integration of new information (107). Finally, from a buddhist perspective, anger management has been divided into several steps which include taking responsibility, increasing awareness, understanding anger as well as the processes of reflection, decision-making, and relaxation (81). Aside from traditional psychotherapeutic approaches, investigators have examined other health-maintenance behaviors as they relate to anger. For example, exercise has been found to be useful in the treatment of anger. In a cross-sectional study, individuals who exercised at least two to three times a week experienced less depression, anger, cynical distrust, and stress than those exercising less frequently or not at all (55). In another study, participation in the martial arts is associated, over time, with decreased feelings of assaultive and Several medications have been used to treat anger symptoms. In individuals with borderline personality disorder, some investigators have reported that the most striking finding was a clinically decrease in anger after treatment with fluoxetine (124). In another study, two thirds of depressed patients with anger attacks at baseline did not report anger attacks following fluoxetine treatment (44). Others have summarized various treatment studies with fluoxetine and have concluded that this medication may be useful in moderating anger as it occurs as part of the symptomatology of a number of Axis I and Axis II disorders (120). More recently, nefazodone’s effect on anger attacks in depression was related to widespread changes in 5HT2 receptor binding potential (95). Finally, administration of the nicotine patch, compared with the placebo patch, has been shown to reduce anger in diary reports in high-hostile participants (66). Anger is an important emotion that has profound health consequences and is based on a complexly organized neural circuitry. Although anger plays an increasingly important role in our daily experience, surprisingly few studies have been carried out to systematically determine which treatment approaches are most effective. A key element in the search for an “effective” treatment for anger is the establishment of the motivation for change in the patient. This may offer a unique opportunity for medication approaches because individuals may not want to exert the psychological effort to participate in individual or group anger therapies but may be ready to take medications in light of the obvious and well- documented health consequences of extreme anger. Nevertheless, future studies will need to examine which types of psychotherapy are most effective in bringing about lasting change. Also, it would be useful to define the interactional benefit of both medication and psychotherapy in the reduction of anger episodes and intensity. Thus, although compared to a review by Novaco (101) there are many more studies that support the adverse health consequences of anger, one could still support his view that many aspects of anger are still poorly understood. 1. Abramowitz S, Wieselberg N: Reaction to relaxation and desensitization outcome: five angry treatment failures. Am.J.Psychiatry 1978; 2. Adolphs R, Damasio H, Tranel D, Damasio AR: Cortical systems for the recognition of emotion in facial expressions. J.Neurosci. 1996; 16:7678- 3. Adolphs R, Tranel D, Hamann S, Young AW, Calder AJ, Phelps EA, Anderson A, Lee GP, Damasio AR: Recognition of facial emotion in nine individuals with bilateral amygdala damage. Neuropsychologia 1999; 37:1111- 4. Anderson AK, Phelps EA: Intact recognition of vocal expressions of fear following bilateral lesions of the human amygdala. Neuroreport 1998; 5. Angelopoulos NV, Tzivaridou D, Nikolaou N, Pavlidis AN: Mental symptoms, hostility features and stressful life events in people with cancer. Acta 6. Baltrusch HJ, Stangel W, Titze I: Stress, cancer and immunity. New developments in biopsychosocial and psychoneuroimmunologic research. Acta 7. Barefoot JC, Siegler IC, Nowlin JB, Peterson BL, Haney TL, Williams RBJ: Suspiciousness, health, and mortality: a follow-up study of 500 older adults. Psychosom.Med. 1987; 49:450-457 8. Bergner L, Hallstrom AP, Bergner M, Eisenberg MS, Cobb LA: Health status of survivors of cardiac arrest and of myocardial infarction controls. 9. Berthoz S, Armony JL, Blair RJ, Dolan RJ: An fMRI study of intentional and unintentional (embarrassing) violations of social norms. Brain 10. Biaggio MK: Anger arousal and personality characteristics. 11. Biaggio MK: Assessment of anger arousal. J.Pers.Assess. 1980; 12. Biaggio MK: Sex differences in behavioral reactions to provocation 13. Biaggio MK, Supplee K, Curtis N: Reliability and validity of four anger scales. J.Pers.Assess. 1981; 45:639-648 14. Bleiker EM, van der Ploeg HM, Mook J, Kleijn WC: Anxiety, anger, and depression in elderly women. Psychol.Rep. 1993; 72:567-574 15. Bruehl S, Burns J, Chung O, Ward P, Johnson B: Anger and pain sensitivity in chronic low back pain patients and pain-free controls: the role of 16. Burns JW: Anger management style and hostility: predicting symptom-specific physiological reactivity among chronic low back pain patients. J 17. Burns JW, Johnson BJ, Devine J, Mahoney N, Pawl R: Anger management style and the prediction of treatment outcome among male and female chronic pain patients. Behav.Res.Ther. 1998; 36:1051-1062 18. Buss, A. H. Durkee A. An inventory for different kinds of hostility. Journal of Consulting Psychology 22, 415-418. 1957. 19. Calhoun PS, Bosworth HB, Siegler IC, Bastian LA: The relationship between hostility and behavioral risk factors for poor health in women veterans. 20. Cao M, Zhang S, Wang K, Wang Y, Wang W: Personality traits in migraine and tension-type headaches: a five-factor model study. 21. Carmody TP, Crossen JR, Wiens AN: Hostility as a health risk factor: relationships with neuroticism, Type A behavior, attentional focus, and interpersonal style. J Clin.Psychol. 1989; 45:754-762 22. Chang PP, Ford DE, Meoni LA, Wang NY, Klag MJ: Anger in young men and subsequent premature cardiovascular disease: the precursors study. 23. Chaput LA, Adams SH, Simon JA, Blumenthal RS, Vittinghoff E, Lin F, Loh E, Matthews KA: Hostility predicts recurrent events among postmenopausal women with coronary heart disease. Am.J.Epidemiol. 2002; 24. Conger JC, Conger AJ, Edmondson C, Tescher B, Smolin J: The relationship of anger and social skills to psychological symptoms. Assessment 25. Cook, W. W. and Medley, D. M. Proposed hostility and pharisaic- virtue scales for the MMPI. Journal of AppliedPsychology 38, 414-418. 1954. 26. Damasio AR: Descartes' error and the future of human life. Sci.Am. 27. Damasio AR: The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex. Philos.Trans.R.Soc.Lond.B.Biol.Sci. 1996; 28. Daniels K, Thornton E: Length of training, hostility and the martial arts: a comparison with other sporting groups. Br.J Sports Med. 1992; 26:118- 29. Davidson RJ, Abercrombie H, Nitschke JB, Putnam K: Regional brain function, emotion and disorders of emotion. Curr.Opin.Neurobiol. 1999; 30. Davidson RJ, Putnam KM, Larson CL: Dysfunction in the neural circuitry of emotion regulation--a possible prelude to violence. Science 2000; 31. Davison GC, Williams ME, Nezami E, Bice TL, DeQuattro VL: Relaxation, reduction in angry articulated thoughts, and improvements in borderline hypertension and heart rate. J.Behav.Med. 1991; 14:453-468 32. Deffenbacher JL, Deffenbacher DM, Lynch RS, Richards TL: Anger, aggression, and risky behavior: a comparison of high and low anger drivers. Behav.Res.Ther. 2003; 41:701-718 33. Deffenbacher JL, Filetti LB, Lynch RS, Dahlen ER, Oetting ER: Cognitive-behavioral treatment of high anger drivers. Behav.Res.Ther. 2002; 34. Deffenbacher JL, Lynch RS, Oetting ER, Swaim RC: The driving anger expression inventory: a measure of how people express their anger on the 35. Deffenbacher JL, Oetting ER, Lynch RS, Morris CD: The expression of anger and its consequences. Behav.Res.Ther. 1996; 34:575-590 36. Dembroski TM, MacDougall JM, Williams RB, Haney TL, Blumenthal JA: Components of Type A, hostility, and anger-in: relationship to angiographic findings. Psychosom.Med. 1985; 47:219-233 37. Dougherty DD, Shin LM, Alpert NM, Pitman RK, Orr SP, Lasko M, Macklin ML, Fischman AJ, Rauch SL: Anger in healthy men: a PET study using script-driven imagery. Biol.Psychiatry 1999; 46:466-472 38. Doyle MA, Biaggio MK: Expression of anger as a function of assertiveness and sex. J.Clin.Psychol. 1981; 37:154-157 39. Dua JK, Swinden ML: Effectiveness of negative-thought-reduction, meditation and placebo training treatment in reducing anger. Scand.J.Psychol. 40. Durel LA, Carver CS, Spitzer SB, Llabre MM, Weintraub JK, Saab PG, Schneiderman N: Associations of blood pressure with self-report measures of anger and hostility among black and white men and women. Health Psychol. 41. Esteves F, Parra C, Dimberg U, Ohman A: Nonconscious associative learning: Pavlovian conditioning of skin conductance responses to masked fear-relevant facial stimuli. Psychophysiology 1994; 31:375-385 42. Everson SA, Kaplan GA, Goldberg DE, Lakka TA, Sivenius J, Salonen JT: Anger expression and incident stroke: prospective evidence from the Kuopio ischemic heart disease study [see comments]. Stroke 1999; 30:523-528 43. Fassino S, Daga GA, Piero A, Leombruni P, Rovera GG: Anger and personality in eating disorders. J.Psychosom.Res. 2001; 51:757-764 44. Fava M, Alpert J, Nierenberg AA, Ghaemi N, O'Sullivan R, Tedlow J, Worthington J, Rosenbaum JF: Fluoxetine treatment of anger attacks: a replication study. Ann.Clin.Psychiatry 1996; 8:7-10 45. Fernandez E, Turk DC: The scope and significance of anger in the experience of chronic pain. Pain 1995; 61:165-175 46. Finney ML, Stoney CM, Engebretson TO: Hostility and anger expression in African American and European American men is associated with cardiovascular and lipid reactivity. Psychophysiology 2002; 39:340-349 47. Forgays DG, Forgays DK, Spielberger CD: Factor structure of the State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory. J.Pers.Assess. 1997; 69:497-507 48. Frasure-Smith N, Lesperance F: Depression and other psychological risks following myocardial infarction. Arch.Gen.Psychiatry 2003; 49. Fredrickson BL, Maynard KE, Helms MJ, Haney TL, Siegler IC, Barefoot JC: Hostility predicts magnitude and duration of blood pressure response to anger. J.Behav.Med. 2000; 23:229-243 50. Futterman LG, Lemberg L: Anger and acute coronary events. Am.J 51. Gaskin ME, Greene AF, Robinson ME, Geisser ME: Negative affect and the experience of chronic pain. J Psychosom.Res. 1992; 36:707-713 52. Gerlock AA: Veterans' responses to anger management intervention. Issues.Ment.Health Nurs. 1994; 15:393-408 53. Gould RA, Ball S, Kaspi SP, Otto MW, Pollack MH, Shekhar A, Fava M: Prevalence and correlates of anger attacks: a two site study. J 54. Greenwald DF, Harder DW: The dimensions of spirituality. 55. Hassmen P, Koivula N, Uutela A: Physical exercise and psychological well-being: A population study in finland. Prev.Med. 2000; 30:17-25 56. Hazaleus SL, Deffenbacher JL: Relaxation and cognitive treatments of anger. J.Consult.Clin.Psychol. 1986; 54:222-226 57. Hearn MD, Murray DM, Luepker RV: Hostility, coronary heart disease, and total mortality: a 33-year follow-up study of university students. 58. Heiby EM, Mearig A: Self-control skills and negative emotional state: a focus on hostility. Psychol.Rep. 2002; 90:627-633 59. Horstmann G: What do facial expressions convey: feeling states, behavioral intentions, or action requests? Emotion. 2003; 3:150-166 60. Houston BK, Vavak CR: Cynical hostility: developmental factors, psychosocial correlates, and health behaviors. Health Psychol. 1991; 10:9-17 61. Howells K, Day A: Readiness for anger management: clinical and theoretical issues. Clin.Psychol.Rev. 2003; 23:319-337 62. Isenberg N, Silbersweig D, Engelien A, Emmerich S, Malavade K, Beattie B, Leon AC, Stern E: Linguistic threat activates the human amygdala. Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.U.S.A. 1999; 96:10456-10459 63. Ishihara S, Makita S, Imai M, Hashimoto T, Nohara R: Relationship between natural killer activity and anger expression in patients with coronary heart disease. Heart Vessels 2003; 18:85-92 64. James GD, Yee LS, Harshfield GA, Blank SG, Pickering TG: The influence of happiness, anger, and anxiety on the blood pressure of borderline hypertensives. Psychosom.Med. 1986; 48:502-508 65. Jamner LD, Shapiro D, Goldstein IB, Hug R: Ambulatory blood pressure and heart rate in paramedics: effects of cynical hostility and defensiveness. Psychosom.Med. 1991; 53:393-406 66. Jamner LD, Shapiro D, Jarvik ME: Nicotine reduces the frequency of anger reports in smokers and nonsmokers with high but not low hostility: an ambulatory study. Exp.Clin.Psychopharmacol 1999; 7:454-463 67. Jancke L: Facial EMG in an anger-provoking situation: individual differences in directing anger outwards or inwards. Int.J.Psychophysiol. 1996; 68. Janssen SA, Spinhoven P, Brosschot JF: Experimentally induced anger, cardiovascular reactivity, and pain sensitivity. J.Psychosom.Res. 2001; 69. Jenkins CD, Somervell PD, Hames CG: Does blood pressure usually rise with age? . . . Or with stress? J.Human Stress 1983; 9:4-12 70. Johnson-Saylor MT: Psychosocial predictors of healthy behaviours in women. J Adv.Nurs. 1991; 16:1164-1171 71. Johnston DW, Anastasiades P: The relationship between heart rate and mood in real life. J.Psychosom.Res. 1990; 34:21-27 72. Jorgensen RS, Houston BK: Cardiovascular reactivity, hostility, and family history of hypertension. Psychother.Psychosom. 1988; 50:216-222 73. Kerns RD, Rosenberg R, Jacob MC: Anger expression and chronic 74. Kim JS, Choi S, Kwon SU, Seo YS: Inability to control anger or aggression after stroke. Neurology 2002; 58:1106-1108 75. Kimbrell TA, George MS, Parekh PI, Ketter TA, Podell DM, Danielson AL, Repella JD, Benson BE, Willis MW, Herscovitch P, Post RM: Regional brain activity during transient self-induced anxiety and anger in healthy adults. Biol.Psychiatry 1999; 46:454-465 76. Knox SS, Siegmund KD, Weidner G, Ellison RC, Adelman A, Paton C: Hostility, social support, and coronary heart disease in the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Family Heart Study. Am.J.Cardiol. 1998; 82:1192-1196 77. Lampert R, Joska T, Burg MM, Batsford WP, McPherson CA, Jain D: Emotional and physical precipitants of ventricular arrhythmia. Circulation 78. Lang PJ, Davis M, Ohman A: Fear and anxiety: animal models and human cognitive psychophysiology. J.Affect.Disord. 2000; 61:137-159 79. Langewitz W, Ruddel H, Von Eiff AW: Influence of perceived level of stress upon ambulatory blood pressure, heart rate, and respiratory frequency. 80. Larkin KT, Zayfert C: Anger management training with mild essential hypertensive patients. J.Behav.Med. 1996; 19:415-433 81. Leifer R: Buddhist conceptualization and treatment of anger. 82. Leiker M, Hailey BJ: A link between hostility and disease: poor health habits? Behav.Med. 1988; 14:129-133 83. Lerner JS, Keltner D: Fear, anger, and risk. J.Pers.Soc.Psychol. 84. Liste KH: Breast cancer, personality and the feminine role. 85. Manuck SB, Corse CD, Winkelman PA: Behavioral correlates of individual differences in blood pressure reactivity. J.Psychosom.Res. 1979; 86. Manuck SB, Craft S, Gold KJ: Coronary-prone behavior pattern and cardiovascular response. Psychophysiology 1978; 15:403-411 87. Manuck SB, Flory JD, Ferrell RE, Dent KM, Mann JJ, Muldoon MF: Aggression and anger-related traits associated with a polymorphism of the tryptophan hydroxylase gene. Biol.Psychiatry 1999; 45:603-614 88. Manuck SB, Harvey AH, Lechleiter SL, Neal SK: Effects of coping on blood pressure responses to threat of aversive stimulation. Psychophysiology 89. Manuck SB, Schaefer DC: Stability of individual differences in cardiovascular reactivity. Physiol.Behav. 1978; 21:675-678 90. Martin R, Watson D, Wan CK: A three-factor model of trait anger: dimensions of affect, behavior, and cognition. J.Pers. 2000; 68:869-897 91. Matthews KA, Woodall KL, Engebretson TO, McCann BS, Stoney CM, Manuck SB, Saab PG: Influence of age, sex, and family on Type A and hostile attitudes and behaviors. Health Psychol. 1992; 11:317-323 92. Mayne TJ, Ambrose TK: Research review on anger in psychotherapy. Journal of Clinical Psychology 1999; 55:353-363 93. McCann JT, Biaggio MK: Narcissistic personality features and self- reported anger. Psychol.Rep. 1989; 64:55-58 94. Meichenbaum D, Turk D: The cognitive-behavioral management of anxiety, anger, and pain. pp. 1- 34. In: Davidson.PO., ed.The behavioral management of anxiety, depression.and pain.New York, Brunner./Mazel., 1975; 95. Mischoulon D, Dougherty DD, Bottonari KA, Gresham RL, Sonawalla SB, Fischman AJ, Fava M: An open pilot study of nefazodone in depression with anger attacks: relationship between clinical response and receptor binding. Psychiatry Res. 2002; 116:151-161 96. Moller J, Hallqvist J, Diderichsen F, Theorell T, Reuterwall C, Ahlbom A: Do episodes of anger trigger myocardial infarction? A case-crossover analysis in the Stockholm Heart Epidemiology Program (SHEEP). 97. Musante L, Treiber FA, Davis H, Strong WB, Levy M: Hostility: relationship to lifestyle behaviors and physical risk factors. Behav.Med. 1992; 98. Niaura R, Todaro JF, Stroud L, Spiro A, III, Ward KD, Weiss S: Hostility, the metabolic syndrome, and incident coronary heart disease. Health 99. Nicholson RA, Gramling SE, Ong JC, Buenevar L: Differences in anger expression between individuals with and without headache after controlling for depression and anxiety. Headache 2003; 43:651-663 100. Norcross JC, Kobayashi M: Treating anger in psychotherapy: Introduction and cases. Journal of Clinical Psychology 1999; 55:275-282 101. Novaco RW: The functions and regulation of the arousal of anger. 102. Novaco RW: Treatment of chronic anger through cognitive and relaxation controls. J.Consult.Clin.Psychol. 1976; 44:681 103. O'Donnell CR, Worell L: Motor and cognitive relaxation in the desensitization of anger. Behav.Res.Ther. 1973; 11:473-481 104. O'Donnell MC, Fisher R, Irvine K, Rickard M, McConaghy N: Emotional suppression: can it predict cancer outcome in women with suspicious screening mammograms? Psychol.Med. 2000; 30:1079-1088 105. Okifuji A, Turk DC, Curran SL: Anger in chronic pain: investigations of anger targets and intensity. J Psychosom.Res. 1999; 47:1-12 106. Orth-Gomer K, Unden AL, Edwards ME: Social isolation and mortality in ischemic heart disease. A 10-year follow-up study of 150 middle-aged 107. Paivio SC: Experiential conceptualization and treatment of anger. Journal of Clinical Psychology 1999; 55:311-324 108. Parkinson B: Anger on and off the road. Br.J.Psychol. 2001; 92 Part 109. Parrott DJ, Zeichner A: Effects of alcohol and trait anger on physical aggression in men. J.Stud.Alcohol 2002; 63:196-204 110. Pauls CA, Stemmler G: Repressive and defensive coping during fear and anger. Emotion. 2003; 3:284-302 111. Peveler RC, Johnston DW: Subjective and cognitive effects of relaxation. Behav.Res.Ther. 1986; 24:413-419 112. Phan KL, Wager T, Taylor SF, Liberzon I: Functional neuroanatomy of emotion: a meta-analysis of emotion activation studies in PET and fMRI. 113. Posternak MA, Zimmerman M: Anger and aggression in psychiatric outpatients. J.Clin.Psychiatry 2002; 63:665-672 114. Rhodes RD, Harrison DW, Demaree HA: Hostility as a moderator of physical reactivity and recovery to stress. Int.J.Neurosci. 2002; 112:167-186 115. Richards JC, Hof A, Alvarenga M: Serum lipids and their relationships with hostility and angry affect and behaviors in men. Health 116. Richards T, Deffenbacher J, Rosen L: Driving anger and other driving-related behaviors in high and low ADHD symptom college students. 117. Rimm DC, DeGroot JC, Boord P, Heiman J, Dillow PV: Systematic desensitization of an anger response. Behav.Res.Ther. 1971; 9:273-280 118. Robins S, Novaco RW: Systems conceptualization and treatment of anger. Journal of Clinical Psychology 1999; 55:325-337 119. Romanov K, Hatakka M, Keskinen E, Laaksonen H, Kaprio J, Rose RJ, Koskenvuo M: Self-reported hostility and suicidal acts, accidents, and accidental deaths: a prospective study of 21,443 adults aged 25 to 59. 120. Rubey RN, Johnson MR, Emmanuel N, Lydiard RB: Fluoxetine in the treatment of anger: an open clinical trial. J.Clin.Psychiatry 1996; 57:398-401 121. Rujescu D, Giegling I, Bondy B, Gietl A, Zill P, Moller HJ: Association of anger-related traits with SNPs in the TPH gene. Mol.Psychiatry 122. Rutledge T, Hogan BE: A quantitative review of prospective evidence linking psychological factors with hypertension development. 123. Sallis JF, Johnson CC, Trevorrow TR, Kaplan RM, Hovell MF: The relationship between cynical hostility and blood pressure reactivity. 124. Salzman C, Wolfson AN, Schatzberg A, Looper J, Henke R, Albanese M, Schwartz J, Miyawaki E: Effect of fluoxetine on anger in symptomatic volunteers with borderline personality disorder. 125. Scherwitz L, Perkins L, Chesney M, Hughes G: Cook-Medley Hostility scale and subsets: relationship to demographic and psychosocial characteristics in young adults in the CARDIA study. Psychosom.Med. 1991; 126. Scott SK, Young AW, Calder AJ, Hellawell DJ, Aggleton JP, Johnson M: Impaired auditory recognition of fear and anger following bilateral amygdala lesions. Nature 1997; 385:254-257 127. Shin LM, Dougherty DD, Orr SP, Pitman RK, Lasko M, Macklin ML, Alpert NM, Fischman AJ, Rauch SL: Activation of anterior paralimbic structures during guilt-related script-driven imagery. Biol.Psychiatry 2000; 48:43-50 128. Siegman AW, Anderson R, Herbst J, Boyle S, Wilkinson J: Dimensions of anger-hostility and cardiovascular reactivity in provoked and angered men. J.Behav.Med. 1992; 15:257-272 129. Siegman AW, Malkin AR, Boyle S, Vaitkus M, Barko W, Franco E: Anger, and plasma lipid, lipoprotein, and glucose levels in healthy women: the mediating role of physical fitness. J Behav.Med. 2002; 25:1-16 130. Smart RG, Mann RE, Stoduto G: The prevalence of road rage: estimates from Ontario. Can.J Public Health 2003; 94:247-250 131. Smith MA, Houston BK: Hostility, anger expression, cardiovascular responsivity, and social support. Biol.Psychol. 1987; 24:39-48 132. Smith TW: Hostility and health: current status of a psychosomatic hypothesis. Health Psychol. 1992; 11:139-150 133. Smith TW, Allred KD: Blood-pressure responses during social interaction in high- and low- cynically hostile males. J.Behav.Med. 1989; 12:135- 134. Smith TW, Frohm KD: What's so unhealthy about hostility? Construct validity and psychosocial correlates of the Cook and Medley Ho scale. 135. Smith TW, Sanders JD, Alexander JF: What does the cook and medley hostility scale measure? Affect, behavior, and attributions in the marital context. J.Pers.Soc.Psychol. 1990; 58:699-708 136. Sparacino J, Ronchi D, Brenner M, Kuhn JW, Flesch AL: Psychological correlates of blood pressure: a closer examination of hostility, anxiety, and engagement. Nurs.Res. 1982; 31:143-149 137. Spielberger CD, Reheiser EC, Sydeman SJ: Measuring the experience, expression, and control of anger. Issues Compr.Pediatr.Nurs. 1995; 138. Sprengelmeyer R, Rausch M, Eysel UT, Przuntek H: Neural structures associated with recognition of facial expressions of basic emotions. Proc.R.Soc.Lond B Biol.Sci. 1998; 265:1927-1931 139. Suarez EC, Lewis JG, Kuhn C: The relation of aggression, hostility, and anger to lipopolysaccharide-stimulated tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha by blood monocytes from normal men. Brain Behav.Immun. 2002; 16:675-684 140. Suarez EC, Williams RBJ: Situational determinants of cardiovascular and emotional reactivity in high and low hostile men. 141. Suarez EC, Williams RBJ: The relationships between dimensions of hostility and cardiovascular reactivity as a function of task characteristics. 142. Suchday S, Larkin KT: Biobehavioral responses to interpersonal conflict during anger expression among anger-in and anger-out men. 143. Tafrate RC, Kassinove H, Dundin L: Anger episodes in high- and low-trait-anger community adults. J Clin.Psychol. 2002; 58:1573-1590 144. Tarter RE, Blackson T, Brigham J, Moss H, Caprara GV: The association between childhood irritability and liability to substance use in early adolescence: a 2-year follow-up study of boys at risk for substance abuse. Drug 145. Taylor EJ, Baird SB, Malone D, McCorkle R: Factors associated with anger in cancer patients and their caregivers. Cancer Pract. 1993; 1:101- 146. Tennant C, McLean L: The impact of emotions on coronary heart disease risk. J.Cardiovasc.Risk 2001; 8:175-183 147. Thomas BS: Direct and indirect effects of selected risk factors in producing adverse consequences of drug use. Subst.Use.Misuse. 1997; 32:377- 148. Thomas SP: Angry? Let's talk about it! Appl.Nurs.Res. 1997; 10:80- 149. Thomas SP, Groer M, Davis M, Droppleman P, Mozingo J, Pierce M: Anger and cancer: an analysis of the linkages. Cancer Nurs. 2000; 23:344- 150. Tijhuis MA, Elshout JR, Feskens EJ, Janssen M, Kromhout D: Prospective investigation of emotional control and cancer risk in men (the Zutphen Elderly Study) (The Netherlands). Cancer Causes Control 2000; 11:589- 151. Treiber FA, Musante L, Riley W, Mabe PA, Carr T, Levy M, Strong WB: The relationship between hostility and blood pressure in children. 152. Unverzagt FW, Schill T: Anger assessment and its relation to self- report of aggressive behavior. Psychol.Rep. 1989; 65:585-586 153. van Eck M, Berkhof H, Nicolson N, Sulon J: The effects of perceived stress, traits, mood states, and stressful daily events on salivary cortisol. Psychosom.Med. 1996; 58:447-458 154. Weidner G, Friend R, Ficarrotto TJ, Mendell NR: Hostility and cardiovascular reactivity to stress in women and men. Psychosom.Med. 1989; 155. Wells-Parker E, Ceminsky J, Hallberg V, Snow RW, Dunaway G, Guiling S, Williams M, Anderson B: An exploratory study of the relationship between road rage and crash experience in a representative sample of US drivers. Accid.Anal.Prev. 2002; 34:271-278 156. Williams JE, Nieto FJ, Sanford CP, Couper DJ, Tyroler HA: The association between trait anger and incident stroke risk: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. Stroke 2002; 33:13-20 157. Williams JE, Paton CC, Siegler IC, Eigenbrodt ML, Nieto FJ, Tyroler HA: Anger proneness predicts coronary heart disease risk: prospective analysis from the atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) study. Circulation
Clinical Chemistry 56:10 1528–1534 (2010) Clinical Chemistry Guide to Scientific Writing Bring Your Best to the Table Sometime in the past you were likely taught about thetext (e.g., mass transitions for 20 different drugs beingimportance of “bringing your best to the table”—inother words contributing your best ideas and results. A good table, although used for a purpose