Microsoft word - 4-jdas, volume 2, issue 1, 39-48

1/ % ? @' " 3> '< ?1 ' " -= " > 1% " 1/ % ? @' " 3> '< ?1 ' " - $ B ;= " %" " "U B$ < < A A 1 1 +; +1 +5 6 78 +9: < 9= > ? +:@ & 3r ! ! +H : & 7 5$ ,1 7 K - G!:/ & A A 1 1 +; +1 +5 6 78 +9: < 9= > ? +:@ & B MH !" +6 +1 +5 6 K C:_9 +:@ & | 6 i 9 4 5$ +1 +5 6 78 +9: < 9= > ? M1 _9 4 +@ A P0 = ( Kg P2O5, P1= ( Kg P2O5, P2= Y( Kg P2O A A 1 1 +; +1 +5 6 78 +9: < 9= > ? +:@ & ( . .Ec) EY !:/ & 1 g:&+& 1 !B I +&Z 1 +& MH +H :K cEc .( !:/ & 1 9;B 1 1 MH +& 7 +1 G K > ? 4 +@ 1 T & 1 G B :/ 1 9 +9 :1 !:/ & 1 + " +9 1 n" [ 1 9;B +5 6 +H :K Y( 78 +9: +H :K ( :& A A 1 1 +; +1 +5 6 78 +9: < 9= > ? +:@ & !:/ & !_ I +&Z 1 1 B I1+K !:B 2 :H America and the Caribbean. International Fertilizer Industry Association, Paris, pp.1-10 16- Magas, D. A. 1974. Forage fertilization. SOC. 17- Murch, S. J., Simmons, C. B. and Saxena, P. K. 1997. Melatonin in feverfew and other medicinal 18- Praszna, L. and Bernath, J. 1993. Correlation between the limited level of nutrition and the 19- Stahi E, Schild W. Pharmazeutische Biologie. 1994. 4. Drogenanalyse II, Inhaltsstoffe und 11- Bernath, J. 1993.Wild and cultivated medicinal Isolierungen. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer Verlag. Franke, R., and Schicher, H., 2005. Taylor, M. Dufault, R. J., Rushing, J., Hassall, R., Shepard, Influence of fertilizer on growth and marker 21- Wahab, J. and Larson, G. 2002. Herb agronomy. compound of field-grown Echinacea species and feverfew. Sciatica Horticulture, 98: 61-69.
22- Wahab, J. and Larson, G. 2003. Herb agronomy. Galal, A. M., Ibrahim, A. R. S., Mossa, J. S. and EI-Feraly, F. K. 1999. Microbial transformation of parthenolid. Phytochemistry, 51: 761-765. 23- Willams, C. A. , Harborne, J. B., Geiger, H., Hornok, L. 1994. Cultivation and processing of medicinal Plants. Academic pub.Budapest,PP.338. Robin, J. and Hoult, S. 1999. The flavonoid of Tanacetum parthenium and T. vulgare and their Lopes, A. S. 1996. Soils under Cerrado:a Success Story in Soil management In: IFA278 references anti- inflammatory properties. Photochemistry, (eds) IFA-PPI Regional Conference for Latin A A 1 1 +; +1 +5 6 78 +9: < 9= > ? +:@ & Effects of Different Levels of Phosphorous and Nitrogen Fertilizers on Yield of German Chamomile (Matricaria recutita L.) Under Semi Arid Climatic Conditions M. Alijani1,∗, M. Amini Dehaghi2, J. Ahmadi3 and S. A. M. Modares Sanavi4 1. M.Sc. of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahed University 2. Assistant Professor, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahed University 3. Assistant Professor, International University of Imam Khomeini 4. Professor, Faculty of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University Received: 2008/11/28 Accepted: 2009/04/21 German Chamomile (Matricaria recutita L.) is an annual plant from the compositeae family. Effects of three levels of urea (0, 40, 80 Kg.ha-1) and triple super phosphate (0, 30, 60 [Kg.ha-1) on the yield and essential oil production of chamomile was investigated. The experiment was a factorial on the basis of randomized complete block design with three replications conducted at Shaded University. Results showed that there was a significant effect of nitrogen fertilization on plant yield (number of flower and dry weight in bush) at the level of %1. Urea at 80 kg/ha resulted in the highest amount of yield by producing 742.2 number of flower and 20.63 g in each bush in comparison with control treatment with 507.06 number of flower and 10.06g in per bush. Phosphorous treatment at 60 kg/ha resulted in the highest amount of yield at 816.26 number of flower and 30.14g in per bush, respectively. Hence, use of 80 kg/ha urea and 60 kg/ha phosphorous is recommended for the highest amount of yield and essence. Keywords: Essential oil, Matricaria recutita, Nitrogen, Phosphorous,

Source: http://jdas.shahed.ac.ir/files/site1/user_files_c48cdc/kayvan-A-10-28-4-df70ad3.pdf