The copper iud for emergency contraception, a neglected option
The copper IUD for emergency contraception, a neglected option
It can be argued that the most important failing of modern
of contraception with every client, those seeking EC deserve
family planning is the persistent epidemic of unintended
information on the major options: oral levonorgestrel or
pregnancy. In developing countries, about 75 million
ulipristal and the copper IUD. In fact, withholding
pregnancies annually are unintended, a number close to the
information about the copper IUD as EC raises ethical
80 million growth of world population each year . In
concerns about quality of care. Emergency contraceptive
the United States, about half of pregnancies are unintended
pills will always be an important option as well, as they are
By the age of 45 years, about half of women in the
easier to access and can be available at 24-hour pharmacies.
United States will have experienced an unintended preg-
There are additional benefits to offering the copper IUD
nancy, and one third will have had an abortion The
as EC beyond its high efficacy. It confers protection beyond
fact that 47% of the 1.2 million annual abortions in the
a single act of unprotected intercourse. Unprotected
United States are repeat procedures is additional evidence
intercourse typically occurs many times among young
of ineffective or nonuse of contraception
women seeking EC, not just as a single episode . Higher
Reducing unintended pregnancy requires a multifaceted
use of IUDs as an ongoing method of contraception would
approach that includes better education about sexuality and
lead to fewer unintended pregnancies and would address not
contraception, improved access to higher-quality family
only a client's immediate need for EC, but also her ongoing
planning counseling and services, and more affordable
need for the most effective contraception
methods and services. A transition from contraceptive
Yet, several barriers to broader availability of the copper
methods that require continuing motivation and conscien-
tious use to long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARC)would markedly reduce unintended pregnancies.
• Many providers lack training on IUD insertion; even
One neglected gateway to LARC use is to offer women
if a clinic has a trained provider, that individual would
seeking emergency contraception (EC) or after experiencing
not necessarily be available all days or hours .
“pregnancy scares” the copper intrauterine device (IUD) —
• Clinic staff may be concerned that offering the IUD as
a safe and effective method of EC The copper IUD
EC would lead to longer appointments that have not
is more than 99% effective as EC, whereas that of
been scheduled and to clinic flow problems.
oral levonorgestrel pills or ulipristal acetate is less than
• Some family planning clinics (especially those relying
90% Although a few large studies in China and a
heavily on Title X) are challenged by limited funds for
small pilot study in the United States have demonstrated
acceptability and continuation rates of the copper IUD as EC,
• Some clients cannot afford the full price or co-payment
Sustained efforts of the reproductive health community
• Some providers believe an insufficient number of
have resulted in the availability of levonorgestrel EC at
women would choose the IUD as EC because of
pharmacies to women aged 17 years or older, and most
inconvenience, cost or not wanting a long-term
contraceptive providers currently offer EC pills at their
practices. However, a California study of contraceptive
• Some providers erroneously assume that IUDs are not
providers showed that only 14.5% offered the copper IUD as
appropriate for EC clients, particularly young women,
EC to their clients at least once The overwhelming
nulliparous women or women who have recently had
majority of women seeking EC in the United States are not
being offered the most effective method of EC.
Two studies in the United States found that more than
Many of the same barriers listed above have also been
10% of women seeking EC in a family planning clinic were
cited by those working to increase access to IUDs for women
interested in the copper IUD While it is neither
at the time of an abortion Encouragingly, efforts to
practical nor desirable for providers to discuss every method
increase availability of postabortion IUDs have obtained
0010-7824/$ – see front matter 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Editorial / Contraception xx (2011) xxx–xxx
great success and yielded significant demand for IUDs
 Finer LB, Henshaw SK. Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy
in the United States, 1994 and 2001. Perspect Sex Reprod Health2006;38:90–6.
Efforts in the United States to address the high incidence
 Jones RK, Singh S, Finer LB, Frohwirth LF. Repeat abortion in the
of unintended pregnancy must include offering the most
United States. New York (NY): Guttmacher Institute; 2006. Occa-
effective contraceptive methods. Particularly in the many
states where contraception is significantly subsidized and
 Zhou L, Xiao B. Emergency contraception with Multiload Cu-375
where there are trained providers, offering the copper IUD to
SL IUD: a multicenter clinical trial. Contraception 2001;64:107–12.
 Wu S, Godfrey EM, Wojdyla D, et al. Copper T380A intrauterine
EC clients should be a routine practice because of a
device for emergency contraception: a prospective, multicenter, cohort
commitment to providing choice for clients and to helping
clinical trial. BJOG 2010;117:1205–20.
 WHO Task Force on Postovulatory Methods of Fertility Regulation.
The estimated annual cost of family planning per client
Randomised controlled trial of levonorgestrel versus the Yuzpe
in publicly supported programs in the United States is
regimen of combined oral contraceptives for emergency contraception. Lancet 1998;352:428–33.
$203 (ranging from $124 and $487) With 17 million
 von Hertzen H, Piggio G, Ding J, et al. Low dose mifepristone and two
women in the United States reliant on public funding for
regimens of levonorgestrel for emergency contraception: a WHO
contraceptive services, an annual expenditure of about
multicentre randomized trial. Lancet 2002;360:1803–10.
$3.5 billion is needed . Yet public outlays for
 Glasier AF, Cameron ST, Fine PM, et al. Ulipristal acetate versus
contraceptive services were only $1.85 billion in 2006 —
levonorgestrel for emergency contraception: a randomized non-inferiority trial and meta-analysis. Lancet 2010;375:555–62.
about one half of the total needed . Moreover, an
 Turok DK, Gurtcheff SE, Handley E, Simonsen SE, Sok C, Murphy P.
estimated $11 billion is spent annually on unintended
A pilot study of the copper T380A IUD and oral levonorgestrel for
pregnancy in the United States — prevention of these
emergency contraception. Contraception 2010;82:520–5.
pregnancies would save taxpayers more than $5 billion.
 Harper CC, Blum M, de Bocanegra HT, et al. Challenges in translating
Thus, the additional outlays to increase access to contracep-
evidence to practice: the provision of intrauterine contraception. ObstetGynecol 2008;111:1359–69.
tive services are likely to yield substantial cost savings as
 Turok DK, Gurtcheff SE, Handley E, et al. A survey of women
well as avoid the potentially negative consequences
obtaining emergency contraception: are they interested in using the
associated with unintended childbearing — including those
copper IUD? Contraception 2011;83:441–6.
that may exacerbate ongoing poverty .
 Schwarz EB, Kavanaugh M, Douglas E, Dubowitz T, Creinin M.
Additional funds for family planning and related
Interest in intrauterine contraception among seekers of emergencycontraception and pregnancy testing. Obstet Gynecol 2009;113:833–9.
reproductive health services must be matched by better
 Raine TR, Harper CC, Rocca CH, et al. Direct access to emergency
policies to ensure their efficient use. Use of the copper IUD
contraception through pharmacies and effect on unintended preg-
for EC and ongoing contraception is a neglected and cost-
nancy and STIs: a randomized, controlled trial. JAMA 2005;293:
effective technology that has the potential to significantly
reduce unintended pregnancy and subsequently improve the
 Thompson KM, Speidel JJ, Saporta V, Waxman NJ, Harper CC.
Contraceptive policies affect post-abortion provision of long-acting
lives of women and their families in both the United States
reversible contraception. Contraception 2011;83:41–7.
 Goodman S, Hendish SK, Benedict C, Reeves MF, Pera-Floyd M,
Foster-Rosales A. Increasing intrauterine contraception use by
reducing barriers to post-abortal and interval insertion. Contraception
 Bednarek PH, Creinin MD, Reeves MF, Cwiak C, Espey E, Jensen
JT. Immediate versus delayed IUD insertion after uterine aspiration. N Engl J Med 2011;364:2208–17.
 Frost JJ, Sonfield A, Gold RB. Estimating the impact of expanding
Medicaid eligibility for family planning services. Occasional Report
Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health
No. 28. New York (NY): Guttmacher Institute; 2006. See
 Sonfield A. Preventing unintended pregnancy: the need and the means.
New York (NY): Guttmacher Institute; 2003.
 Frost JJ, Sonfield A, Gold RB. Ahmed FH. Estimating the impact of
serving new clients by expanding funding for Title X. New York (NY):
 Sonfield A, Gold RB. Public funding for contraceptive, sterilization
and abortion services, FY1980–2001. New York (NY): Guttmacher
 Monea E, Thomas A. Unintended pregnancy and taxpayer spending.
 Singh S, Darroch JE, Ashford L, et al, editors. Adding it up: the costs
Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2011;43:88–93, doi:.
and benefits of investing in family planning and maternal and newborn
 Sonfield A, Kost K, Gold RB, Finer LB. The public costs of births
health. New York (NY): Guttmacher Institute and United Nations
resulting from unintended pregnancies. Perspect Sex Reprod Health
ELIZABETH ANN CALHOUN, Ph.D. Home : 2342 West Erie Street, Chicago, IL. 60612 Office: 1603 W. Taylor Street #789, Chicago, IL 60612 Home: 773-862-1701 Office: (312) 355-1572 Fax: (312) 996-5356 Education The Cost-Effectiveness and Outcomes of Assertive Case ManagementCommunity Treatment Programs Targeting Long-Stay PsychiatricInpatients Across the State of South Carolina. Pro
UNIVERSITAIRE ZIEKENHUIZEN LEUVEN Oftalmologie FAQ on floaters Q: How are floaters removed? A: By vitrectomy. Three small incisions are made in the eyeball through which the vitreous gel is removed, while simultaneously the eye is filled with a clear salt solution. Q: What’s the difference between 25G and 20G (and 23G) surgery? A: In “classic” 20G vitrectomy, the conjunctiva i